Blog Layout

Agile Project Planning - what are the planning myths?

Don’t be fooled by the latest fad in project management, Agile. Agile is pitched as a revolutionary method, but the fact is, it simply DOES NOT GET THE RESULTS that visual waterfall approaches do. Period.

We see team after team fail using Agile methods, for very specific reasons. Let’s look at the painful TRUTHs of using Agile methods:

To optimize project speed, a variety of tools are needed, not just sprints and standup meetings. Mapping the critical path, finding all dependencies, and visually laying out the path forward are all critical elements of success. In fact, they are absolutely REQUIRED to execute effectively and achieve goals. This is true even for highly innovative projects where details are not known a priori and flexibility is needed. The Agile methodology strips away some of the most critical, proven project management tools, leaving teams "flying blind". This leads to unnecessary chaos that radically slows progress.

All planning techniques must adapt to change. Agile is not a magical method that allows for teams to react to change in a way that other methods do not. The reality is that all project teams must work dynamically. If a change to intermediate or end goals is needed, or an innovation or market shift drives a change of direction, teams must re-scope and get the change immediately into the planning. (That is, if they cannot eliminate or defer the scope creep.)

Agile tools are nothing new. In fact, they're just a rebranded subset of techniques the best project managers have been using for decades. For example, sprints serve to keep the team focused on achieving near-term deliverables. Effective PM's always keep near term deliverables front-and-center and hold people accountable to the deadlines. Another example is the stand-up meeting, again, something effective PM's have always used for rapid-fire daily updates to drive urgency without getting bogged down. Standup meetings are only truly effective within the context of a detailed plan – team members must understand and report on those actions due each week to achieve the critical path milestone deadlines.

Agile project management DOES NOT provide visibility to top-level project goals and dependencies among deliverables. Sprints are fine, but projects are often complex marathons. A team making sprints without seeing the master plan and context is just spinning its wheels. Teams that sprint from point to point without a clear idea of the big-picture route lose their way, wasting precious time and resources. Agile methods completely fail to "connect the dots" among dependencies (the waterfall), leading to avoidable delays. Sadly, we see it all the time. 

Action is not the same as progress. Agile is deceptive because it provides the illusion of speed, while actually causing confusion, thereby slowing things down. Agile methods keep teams busy, but their activity is often not aligned with top-level project goals. Misaligned actions that don't drive toward the desired business goals are the very definition of wasted resources.

Team organization is TERRIBLE with Agile. Teams get stuck closing out tickets with no vision of the overall project roadmap. It's like a fog has descended – no one can explain the importance of assigned deliverables and no one is clear on what the milestones are. This leads to a lack of accountability for results. How many software teams have you tried to manage where all actions are hidden inside a ticketing tool (such as Jira), resulting in poor ability to predict outcomes or track progress to deadlines, and no visibility to recognize if things are going off track so you can quickly course-correct? We have to re-set teams all the time and generate highly visible plans using waterfall techniques to drive alignment, accountability, and progress. 

In summary, don’t let your organization be fooled by the latest fad in project management. Re-branding a subset of project management tools into “Agile” is not a novel magic bullet. In fact, it's entirely counterproductive. Project managers navigate the toughest of projects using ALL of the best tools available; when done right, they always include a waterfall approach that drives visibility and accountability.

"Plans are worthless, but planning is indispensable." – Dwight Eisenhower
Visual 8D Breakthrough image
April 1, 2025
Problem-solving methods haven’t changed in over 20 years, and some methods have been around for 30-50 years without significant improvement. CAEDENCE has released a novel improvement to problem-solving that overcomes shortfalls in existing methods. Applicable to all structured problem-solving approaches, Visual 8D™ enables teams to execute the familiar problem-solving steps (with no additional effort), while capturing plans and progress in easy-to-follow diagrams. Visual 8D™ puts teams in the position of providing answers to management and customer questions before being asked, resulting in improved control of the situation and minimizing time wasted on extraneous actions.
Ready Aim Fire Image
March 31, 2025
Being action-oriented is a good thing, right? Well, yes and no. There's a big difference between learning and adjusting quickly ("failing fast") and wasting time and resources by "rushing off half cocked". Executives and teams alike are eager to be (and be seen) "doing something", but they often fail to recognize the distinction between 'activity' and 'progress'. As a result, they act upon the first reasonable idea that comes along. The trouble with acting on the first reasonable idea is twofold. First, there might have been much better ideas, and second, once you start working on the first idea, you stop looking for the better ones. Outcomes are often sub-optimal – problems not solved, product not launched, etc. Want to dramatically improve your team's odds of achieving consistently strong outcomes? Next time everyone's ready to run with the first reasonable idea, set aside just 30 minutes and challenge the group with this 3-step process.
Who's in charge image
March 29, 2025
I was asked to take over the redesign project as lead engineer after a team from another site had struggled and failed to meet the financial target. The assignment came with one condition (which, in hindsight, should have been a big red flag): “Don’t let the original leader know he’s not in charge anymore, we need to keep him engaged.” If I had it to do over again, I’m quite certain we could have delivered on the goal in half the time if team leadership had been clearly defined.   Management made several fundamental errors with this team: (1) They should have recognized the original project was not on track and intervened to course-correct much sooner. (2) They should have trusted the original team leader to act professionally and contribute despite being displaced, rather than feel it necessary to deceive him. (3) They should have made the leadership responsibilities unambiguous to everyone involved.
Polishing a diamond image representing development of new leaders
March 6, 2025
Some years ago, a bright young engineer was assigned to my group. He was very capable, energetic, and technically sharp, but a bit “rough around the edges” when it came to dealing with people. My job was to “polish the diamond-in-the-rough”, to teach him the soft skills he would need to succeed. I provided one-on-one feedback after attending his meetings to help him see how his abrasive style was holding him back, and to offer some alternative ways of communicating that would not only get the tasks done but also nurture long-term allies who would want to help him again in the future.
Stacking the deck in your favor image
March 5, 2025
While there are a lot of great leadership techniques and tips out there, it turns out there is no magic bullet that works every time for every situation. You have to apply the best practices with consistency and integrity. You have to build environments of trust and common purpose. You have to measure and check. Doing so will not guarantee success, but it will stack the deck in your favor, maximizing your chances of succeeding.
Driving continuous improvement image
March 4, 2025
Continuous improvement in a business is not a one-time action. It comes from a series of smaller actions taken over a long period of time. Driving improvement requires steadfast attention and a drive to achieve excellence. It can take months or years to make permanent improvements and change a culture. In your projects and initiatives, are you keeping your ‘foot on the gas’ to change the long-term outcomes?
Cost reduction image
March 3, 2025
Executing an effective cost reduction initiative goes beyond simply identifying a need, communicating a dollar value, and holding workshops. Cost reduction initiatives must start with a broader review of gap areas across the entire enterprise (considering existing and acquired sites) and definition of the future state goals. Buy-in must be secured among the key stakeholders and participants. The steps and metrics needed to ensure engagement before, and accountability beyond, the initiative kickoff must be planned.
Ideas are cheap graphic
January 27, 2025
Why are ideas cheap? Supply and demand – there are lots of ideas out there – everyone fancies themself an innovator, the supply far outstrips the demand. BUT, coming up with a good idea is only 1% of the success of a business. The hard part remains…. Why does execution matter more? Once an idea is created, there are hundreds of steps needed to turn it into a viable product backed by a viable business model. Driving rigor at speed through the product development, marketing and sales, pre-launch, and production ramp processes is what will make your business successful.
Methods of communication and their impact
January 21, 2025
If you've got a favorite way of communicating (perhaps by text, email, or in-person) that you use most of the time, you are undermining the effectiveness of your communication! If you've ever been frustrated that your team or manager isn't taking action on what you've told them must be done – this post & infographic is for you. Not all modes of communication are created equal. The way you communicate should be selected based on 3 situational factors: who you're communicating with, the gravity of your message, the outcome you're trying to achieve. Choosing the the mode appropriate to your purpose will greatly enhance the impact of your messaging. Choosing the wrong mode can undermine what you're trying to accomplish by communicating.
Visual 8D image problem solving
December 3, 2024
CAEDENCE has developed a novel improvement to overcome the communication-based shortfalls in existing methods. Applicable to all structured problem-solving approaches, Visual 8D™ enables teams to execute the familiar problem-solving steps (with no additional effort), while capturing plans and progress in easy-to-follow diagrams. Visual 8D™ puts teams in the position of providing answers to management and customer questions before being asked, resulting in improved control of the situation and minimizing time wasted on extraneous actions.
Show More
Share by: