I was asked to take over the redesign project as lead engineer after a team from another site had struggled and failed to meet the financial target. The assignment came with one condition (which, in hindsight, should have been a big red flag): “Don’t let the original leader know he’s not in charge anymore, we need to keep him engaged.”
As you might have guessed, the subsequent 24 months were not fun. It was nearly impossible to get alignment on any decision. We had so many meetings discussing and re-discussing the same issues ad nauseum. We kept up the pretense and slogged through the work, ultimately delivering a successful cost-reduced redesign. However, if I had it to do over again, I’m quite certain we could have delivered on the goal in half the time if team leadership had been clearly defined.
Management made several fundamental errors with this team:
(1) They should have recognized the original project was not on track and intervened to course-correct much sooner.
(2) They should have trusted the original team leader to act professionally and contribute despite being displaced, rather than feel it necessary to deceive him.
(3) They should have made the leadership responsibilities unambiguous to everyone involved.
This and so many other hard-won lessons have culminated in the approach used in CAEDENCE's "Lead On!™" leadership development program. Check it out here:
https://www.caedenceconsulting.com/services (scroll down and click on Leadership Development Program for Individuals and Groups )