Getting the most out of your performance review – Writing Your Self-Assessment - Tip #1 

Like them or not, annual performance reviews are a staple of many company cultures. Often the employee is required to prepare a self-assessment. “I always try to do high quality work” is a common self-assessment response – but it’s worthless! (The problem is that anyone can make that claim. You need to differentiate yourself!) Instead, open with an action word and quantify the impact you had; writing a self- assessment is akin to writing a resume – similar advice applies. 

For example, “Simplified the process for analyzing failed assemblies resulting in 32% faster throughput and 20% improvement in the accuracy of the analysis findings.” To get the most out of your annual self-assessment, be specific and memorable. Provide evidence of your achievements so that you stand out. Give your manager something tangible to work with when they’re advocating on your behalf. 

Personally, I’m a fan of the annual review. All year we’re buried in issues; it can be hard to see the effect our efforts are having. Taking some time to reflect on the year’s accomplishments puts everything in perspective; we can see that all those daily steps and frustrations have added up to result in a real impact. Reflection also helps us recognize those areas where things fell short, which can be useful in identifying project goals and skills to work on in the coming months. 

The key take-away here: Specific, noteworthy examples of accomplishments not only make us feel good, but they maximize our chances of a good review from management, and hopefully a nice raise as well.

Stay tuned for more annual performance review tips.
People Dislike You Image
November 18, 2025
Networking and communication build and sustain the relationships that make business work. Avoid these bad habits immediately or people will dislike you immediately.
Masential Skills Image
November 17, 2025
Mastering these 5 missing skills quickly maximizes your productivity and influence, which in turn enhances both job security and advancement potential.
Image for developing engineers
November 16, 2025
I explained the goal in designing any component. Overly tight specifications would make it harder to find suppliers and would drive up costs. The engineer's entire approach changed.
Image of preparing for customer response
October 2, 2025
Preparing for a presentation is vital in enabling team members to convey critical points, and influence outcomes with customers. Here are the steps involved.
Image of 3Cs for customer management
October 1, 2025
When customer tensions rise, the right approach can turn friction into collaboration. At CAEDENCE, we call it the 3C’s: Calm, Clarify, Control. Here's more detail.
Image of AI not replacing customer communication
September 30, 2025
Will AI Replace Direct Customer Communication? Absolutely Not! In an age of chatbots and algorithms, the highest-impact discussions still happen person-to-person.
Managing tough customers image
September 29, 2025
B2B customer relationships are not a breeze. We’ve navigated hundreds of challenging accounts and distilled five secrets that consistently turn friction into forward progress.
Developing team without jumping to solutions
September 26, 2025
Ever notice how a quick fix from the top can feel like a shortcut, but it ends up stunting your team’s growth? When managers rush to answers, they inadvertently affect team development.
Problem solving misconception
July 26, 2025
Over the years we’ve been exposed to Six Sigma, Juran, Deming PDCA, 8D, Dale Carnegie, A3, Shainin, and more. Each technique works pretty well, and has been demonstrated many times in a wide variety of industries and circumstances. At the core they are all essentially the same! Each approach relies on an underlying logical flow that goes like this: [a] make sure the problem is clearly defined; [b] be open to all sources of information; [c] vet the information for relevance and accuracy; [d] use the process of elimination to narrow down all possible causes to the most likely few; [e] prove which of the suspects is really the cause of the issue; [f] generate a number of potential solutions; [g] evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility and risk of the potential solutions; [h] implement the winning solution(s); and [i] take steps to make sure your solution(s) don’t unravel in the future. The differences between the paradigms resides in supplementary steps and toolkits. For example, 8D contains the important “In
Poor problem solving lob image cost impact
July 26, 2025
Your team is marching through the tools of your company's chosen problem-solving approach. This is time not spent on growing your business or delivering cost reductions. Yet your customers are suffering, and they're not shy about letting you know it! Why isn't it working?
Show More